A-10 Thunderbolt II Military su flanker History
Home Articles Ancient armies of the Middle Ages 1500s 1600s 1700s 1800s World War I World War II Modern conflicts Series champion warfare Military mistake Soldier in fields News Front Pictures Chronicle Reader Memories Quiz! Technology
It is often said that a beautiful aircraft is a successful aircraft. A-10 Thunderbolt II, nicknamed "Our wine," su flanker in this case is the exception that proves the rule. Even today, the combat pilots' favorite planes.
D uring the Second World War latter half developed the US Air Force to direct air over the support for ground troops to an art. The aircraft could be a long time in the waiting laps over the front and on the radio quickly attack the enemy threat on the ground. This tactic was crucial for both the Allies broke through the German lines after the invasion of Normandy in 1944 and Okinawa in 1945. The same technique was later used in the Korean su flanker War. There dominated the early and relatively slow jets joined by late propeller types. su flanker Jetplanens su flanker performance increased rapidly in terms of both speed and operational altitude.
But when nations from the late 1950s began to put their faith accurate missiles and tactical su flanker nuclear weapons were forgotten immediately below the support away. The need for an aircraft designed to support ground troops became noticeable only after the Vietnam War escalated during the 1960s. When was the American troops often involved in intense battles that required help from the air. The Americans had to resort to emergency solutions like converting school level T-37 Dragonfly attack data. In addition, he made up the obsolete propeller types A-1 Skyraider and A-26 Invader.
When the then Chief of Staff of the US Air Force, General su flanker John P. McConnell, visited Vietnam in 1966, he became aware of the problem. su flanker The following year, let McConnell get the project AX (Attack Experimental). The assignment was to design a suitable aircraft for support of ground troops.
Fighting forces from North Vietnam had begun to dominate the country's conventional army instead of guerrilla units. These new units had armor that the weakly armed US helicopters were unable to attack. To combat this type of case was therefore an important task for the new plane.
In March 1967, the Air Force issued an invitation to 21 different manufacturers that submit proposals in a cost-attack aircraft. The heart of the airplane would be a new gun that worked against tanks. An impact on the armor was in fact almost impossible with existing aircraft guns. The tactics applied (for example, by Israel in the Six-Day War in 1967) was to attack from behind or get a hit on the turret ring or band so that the tank was unusable. The heaviest guns Americans had on their aircraft was 20mm Vulcan cannon turret whose projectiles were not strong enough.
A definite requirement specification for the whole AX project ended in May 1970. Six manufacturers provided complete proposal before the deadline of August 10th. In December, it was decided that two companies, Northrop and Fairchild Republic, would build a respective prototype, YA-9 and YA-10. After a fly off - test flight - would then be the best machine selected. Both aircraft must be capable of carrying the gun GAU-8, who simultaneously was under development. An important requirement was also an extreme resistance to impingement. This was needed because the slow flying at low altitude over the battlefield meant to invite the enemy on goal.
YA-9 received su flanker a conventional appearance with sleek lines and wing high-placed on the body. YA-10, however, was not a pretty flat. "It looks like a collection of parts that you forgot to mount from the beginning," as a fighter pilot put it. The wing was positioned low and head instead sat in hoods under it. One advantage of this was that the plane could not take the load over the body. The wheels stuck out a bit out of the covers, and would act as shock absorbers if the plane was forced to make a belly landing. Places dropped back so that they would be pulled out of the air draft of hydraulics did not work.
All the plane's lines were virtually straight except for the nose, where the cannon sticking out. It was slightly displaced to the left to the pipe fired would be on midline. The cannon su flanker placement ended up nose gear instead su flanker slightly to the right. In the stern was the major engines placed on the "stem" sticking out of the body. The advantage of this was that the fuel would not flow into the engine and ignite if fuel tanks in the wing or body injured. su flanker A hit would thus not necessarily knock out both engines.
The fin was assigned as the partially shielded by heating the image plane. In this way were protected bench against heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles. (This was helped su flanker even the big engine covers.) The fan jet engines, General Electric TF34-GE-100, was developed from those used in anti-submarine warfare plane S-3 Viking.
The protection of the pilot
Home Articles Ancient armies of the Middle Ages 1500s 1600s 1700s 1800s World War I World War II Modern conflicts Series champion warfare Military mistake Soldier in fields News Front Pictures Chronicle Reader Memories Quiz! Technology
It is often said that a beautiful aircraft is a successful aircraft. A-10 Thunderbolt II, nicknamed "Our wine," su flanker in this case is the exception that proves the rule. Even today, the combat pilots' favorite planes.
D uring the Second World War latter half developed the US Air Force to direct air over the support for ground troops to an art. The aircraft could be a long time in the waiting laps over the front and on the radio quickly attack the enemy threat on the ground. This tactic was crucial for both the Allies broke through the German lines after the invasion of Normandy in 1944 and Okinawa in 1945. The same technique was later used in the Korean su flanker War. There dominated the early and relatively slow jets joined by late propeller types. su flanker Jetplanens su flanker performance increased rapidly in terms of both speed and operational altitude.
But when nations from the late 1950s began to put their faith accurate missiles and tactical su flanker nuclear weapons were forgotten immediately below the support away. The need for an aircraft designed to support ground troops became noticeable only after the Vietnam War escalated during the 1960s. When was the American troops often involved in intense battles that required help from the air. The Americans had to resort to emergency solutions like converting school level T-37 Dragonfly attack data. In addition, he made up the obsolete propeller types A-1 Skyraider and A-26 Invader.
When the then Chief of Staff of the US Air Force, General su flanker John P. McConnell, visited Vietnam in 1966, he became aware of the problem. su flanker The following year, let McConnell get the project AX (Attack Experimental). The assignment was to design a suitable aircraft for support of ground troops.
Fighting forces from North Vietnam had begun to dominate the country's conventional army instead of guerrilla units. These new units had armor that the weakly armed US helicopters were unable to attack. To combat this type of case was therefore an important task for the new plane.
In March 1967, the Air Force issued an invitation to 21 different manufacturers that submit proposals in a cost-attack aircraft. The heart of the airplane would be a new gun that worked against tanks. An impact on the armor was in fact almost impossible with existing aircraft guns. The tactics applied (for example, by Israel in the Six-Day War in 1967) was to attack from behind or get a hit on the turret ring or band so that the tank was unusable. The heaviest guns Americans had on their aircraft was 20mm Vulcan cannon turret whose projectiles were not strong enough.
A definite requirement specification for the whole AX project ended in May 1970. Six manufacturers provided complete proposal before the deadline of August 10th. In December, it was decided that two companies, Northrop and Fairchild Republic, would build a respective prototype, YA-9 and YA-10. After a fly off - test flight - would then be the best machine selected. Both aircraft must be capable of carrying the gun GAU-8, who simultaneously was under development. An important requirement was also an extreme resistance to impingement. This was needed because the slow flying at low altitude over the battlefield meant to invite the enemy on goal.
YA-9 received su flanker a conventional appearance with sleek lines and wing high-placed on the body. YA-10, however, was not a pretty flat. "It looks like a collection of parts that you forgot to mount from the beginning," as a fighter pilot put it. The wing was positioned low and head instead sat in hoods under it. One advantage of this was that the plane could not take the load over the body. The wheels stuck out a bit out of the covers, and would act as shock absorbers if the plane was forced to make a belly landing. Places dropped back so that they would be pulled out of the air draft of hydraulics did not work.
All the plane's lines were virtually straight except for the nose, where the cannon sticking out. It was slightly displaced to the left to the pipe fired would be on midline. The cannon su flanker placement ended up nose gear instead su flanker slightly to the right. In the stern was the major engines placed on the "stem" sticking out of the body. The advantage of this was that the fuel would not flow into the engine and ignite if fuel tanks in the wing or body injured. su flanker A hit would thus not necessarily knock out both engines.
The fin was assigned as the partially shielded by heating the image plane. In this way were protected bench against heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles. (This was helped su flanker even the big engine covers.) The fan jet engines, General Electric TF34-GE-100, was developed from those used in anti-submarine warfare plane S-3 Viking.
The protection of the pilot
No comments:
Post a Comment